To Pay Trustees, or Not to Pay Trustees?

Author: Simin Wadiwala, Associate Trustee, Friends Provident Foundation

Date: 24/04/2025

Two years ago, during my interview for a trustee position at Friends Provident Foundation (FPF), I asked a straightforward question: Would the role be paid?

 

At the time, I was part of the Foundation’s grants advisory group and knew that stepping into a trustee role would mean giving up paid work for something far more demanding. Our Chief Executive said they’d think about it – and in 2023, they came back with a proposal: Take on the newly created role of Associate Trustee.

 

While I didn’t yet have extensive experience in certain areas of strategic development, I brought different perspectives and insights to the table – and FPF saw the value in that.

 

What Is an Associate Trustee?

 

The Associate Trustee role was designed to support learning and development, with a £4,000 annual training budget and regular one-to-one check-ins with the Foundation’s director every six weeks.

 

Crucially, it recognised something that’s often overlooked in the sector: to truly grow into the responsibilities of trusteeship, you need time – and that time needs to be supported financially. Friends Provident Foundation understood this, and acted accordingly.

 

From Associate to Full Trustee?

 

A key goal of the Associate Trustee role is progression. Unlike similar schemes at other trusts and foundations, this one includes clear succession planning – with the expectation that an associate might move into a full trustee role, subject to board approval.

 

But there’s a catch: FPF’s governing documents don’t currently allow for trustees to be paid. So, while the plan was for me to eventually join the board, that step has been on hold while the Charity Commission considers FPF’s application to amend its rules.

 

What Happens If the Charity Commission Approves the Change?

 

If approved, the new rules would allow up to two trustees (of ten) to receive remuneration. The aim isn’t to pay all trustees, but to open the door for people who would otherwise be unable to participate due to financial constraints.

 

Importantly, this payment wouldn’t be means-tested – a deliberate decision to avoid complexity and to trust people to raise the issue at the right time, whether at interview or once in post.

 

A £300 Monthly Payment

 

As an Associate Trustee, I’ve been invoicing for £300 a month – not including expenses, which are reimbursed separately. This payment has made a real difference to my ability to participate fully, though it’s not intended to cover all costs.

 

The original plan was for the Associate Trustee role to be a one-year pilot (2023–2024). But with the Charity Commission decision still pending, I’ve remained in post for a second year.

 

What Has the Role Involved?

 

Over this time, I’ve:

  • Attended quarterly board and committee meetings
  • Developed detailed vocabulary lists (trusteeship is its own language!)
  • Dug into the world of asset managers and social investment
  • Explored the tech that supports transparent grantmaking
  • Taken deep dives into our accounts

I’ve also found myself regularly sitting in boardrooms high above the City, surrounded by senior leaders in the social finance sector — and feeling somewhat out of place. I’m told this sense of discomfort is a sign I do bring a genuinely different perspective, which is exactly the point.

 

Why This Matters

 

What’s struck me most is that Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion at FPF isn’t about ticking boxes or doing the ‘right thing.’ It’s embedded in how trustees understand and pursue the Foundation’s mission: building a fair and sustainable economy for people and planet. That mission can’t be achieved without broadening who gets to participate in economic decision-making.

And sometimes, participation requires payment.

 

By Simin Wadiwala, Associate Trustee, Friends Provident Foundation